ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2019 | Volume
: 12
| Issue : 6 | Page : 503-507 |
|
Investigation of a cancer cluster in an industrial area of North India
Vijay Kumar Barwal1, Shishupal Singh Thakur2, Sanjay Kumar3, Salig Ram Mazta4, Anmol Gupta1, Ankit Chaudhary1
1 Department of Community Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India 2 Department of Community Medicine, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India 3 Department of Community Medicine, Dr. S Radhakrishnan Government Medical College, Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, India 4 Department of Community Medicine, Dr. YS Parmar Government Medical College, Nahan, Himachal Pradesh, India
Correspondence Address:
Vijay Kumar Barwal Department of Community Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_240_18
|
|
Introduction: Cancer clusters always get a lot of attention in the media. It is an aggregation of relatively unexpected high number of cancer cases. People become concerned that a cancer cluster exists in a certain community and that it is caused by some type of carcinogen that is being released into the environment. We investigated a similar concern regarding suspected clustering of cancer cases in an industrial area of a district in North India. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out from March 1, 2016, to May 31, 2016 taking the whole study area population as exposed. House-to-house search of cancer cases was undertaken retrospectively from the year 2011 onward. The total population of the cohort (denominator) was taken from the census of India 2011 data. Age-adjusted standardized rates were calculated. Results: A total of 53 cancer patients were identified. A maximum number of cases were of the lip and oropharynx (15.1%), followed by the lung (13.2%) and esophagus. The yearly incidence of cancer for both sexes ranged from 87.2 to 90.9/lakh population. The 5-year period prevalence for both sexes was 207.4/lakh population. Conclusion: This panic occurred due to a list of cancer cases given to the health department by the residents and public representatives of the area. As these were just figures without a denominator, it gave a false impression of a high number of cancer cases. However, on conducting this study, we found the age-adjusted cancer incidence to be similar or even lower than the Global Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence, and Indian Council for Medical Research figures for India. Hence, we ruled out a true cancer cluster.
|
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|