|
 |
LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
|
Year : 2020 | Volume
: 13
| Issue : 1 | Page : 93-94 |
|
|
An unusual case of transition from pemphigus vulgaris to pemphigus foliaceus
Rashmi B Aderao, Uddhao S Zambare, Swagata A Tambe, Chitra S Nayak
Department of Dermatology, T. N. M. C. and B. Y. L. Nair Ch. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Date of Web Publication | 16-Dec-2019 |
Correspondence Address: Uddhao S Zambare Department of Dermatology, OPD 14, 2nd Floor, OPD Building, T. N. M. C. and B. Y. L. Nair Ch. Hospital, Mumbai - 400 008, Maharashtra India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_118_18
How to cite this article: Aderao RB, Zambare US, Tambe SA, Nayak CS. An unusual case of transition from pemphigus vulgaris to pemphigus foliaceus. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth 2020;13:93-4 |
How to cite this URL: Aderao RB, Zambare US, Tambe SA, Nayak CS. An unusual case of transition from pemphigus vulgaris to pemphigus foliaceus. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth [serial online] 2020 [cited 2023 Mar 24];13:93-4. Available from: https://www.mjdrdypv.org/text.asp?2020/13/1/93/272873 |
Dear Sir,
Pemphigus is an autoimmune vesiculobullous disorder affecting the skin and mucus membrane. It is classified as pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF), depending on the level of intraepidermal split and the antibodies involved and the involvement of mucus membrane. PV involves the oral mucosa and shows suprabasal acantholysis; the mucosal-dominant type of PV has anti-desmoglein (Dsg) 3 antibodies and the mucocutaneous type of PV has both anti-Dsg 1 and anti-Dsg 3 antibodies. In contrast, PF shows subcorneal acantholysis and does not involve the mucus membrane and has anti-Dsg 1 antibodies. Although transition between the two forms of pemphigus is uncommon, few cases have been reported in literature. The transition of PV to PF is more common than that of PF to PV. The mechanism of the transition is explained on the basis of epitope-spreading phenomenon.
Here, we report the case of a 23-year-old male who presented with complaints of multiple fluid-filled lesions all over the body of 2 months' duration. The patient also had difficulty in swallowing and congestion and discharge from the eyes for 1 week.
On clinical examination, there were multiple flaccid vesicles with erosion and crusting over the entire body [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b with involvement of ocular and oral mucosa. Biopsy revealed absent epidermis with row of tombstone appearance of basal cells, consistent with PV [Figure 1]c. The patient was given dexamethasone-azathioprine pulse therapy without much improvement and, hence, was shifted to dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide (DCP) pulse therapy along with oral prednisolone in tapering dosages. As a side effect of corticosteroids, the patient developed diabetes mellitus and hypertension. However, the patient was still developing multiple new lesions even after 28 DCP pulses; he stopped all the treatment on his own and consequently developed erythroderma. | Figure 1: (a and b) Multiple flaccid vesicles with erosion and crusting over the body and face. (c): Histopathology (×100) shows absent epidermis with row of tombstone appearance of basal cells, consistent with pemphigus vulgaris
Click here to view |
At this time, we decided to give him rituximab according to rheumatoid arthritis protocol (two doses of 1000 mg 15 days apart). The patient responded very well with resolution of mucosal lesions but developed hyperkeratotic plaques all over the body [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b, the histopathology of which revealed subcorneal cleft with acantholytic cells consistent with PF [Figure 2]c. His anti-Dsg 1 levels were 122.6 μg/ml (n = 20 μ/ml) and anti-Dsg 3 were 1.9 μg/ml (n = 14 μ/ml). The patient has been continued on DCP pulse. | Figure 2: (a and b) Hyperkeratotic plaques all over the body and face.(c): Histopathology (×100) shows subcorneal cleft with acantholytic cells consistent with pemphigus foliaceus
Click here to view |
The mechanism of transition between PV and PF is thought to be an epitope-spreading phenomenon. It is either primary autoimmune or inflammatory process that causes tissue damage causing previously immunologically hidden protein to be exposed to the immune system, thereby evoking a secondary autoimmune response leading to the production of autoantibodies against new antigens.[1],[2]
In addition, it is said that the biochemical similarity between Dsg 1 and Dsg 3 is responsible for the antibodies to either one of them recognizing epitopes on the other.[3] Immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay are used to demonstrate the autoantibodies in pemphigus.
In this case of PV transforming to PF, even though initial anti-Dsg levels were not done, test done at the time of erythrodermic episode showed normal levels of anti-Dsg 3 and high levels of anti-Dsg 1 antibodies with subcorneal cleft on histopathology. At initial presentation, the histopathology was that of a suprabasal cleft, confirming a diagnosis of PV. Thus, we concluded that there was a transition from PV to PF in this patient.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Park SG, Chang JY, Cho YH, Kim SC, Lee MG. Transition from pemphigus foliaceus to pemphigus vulgaris: Case report with literature review. Yonsei Med J 2006;47:278-81. |
2. | Shih PY, Kuo TT, Chiou CC, Wang JR, Yu KJ, Ho HC, et al. Transition from pemphigus vulgaris to pemphigus foliaceus report of two cases. Dermatol Sinica 2009;27:52-8. |
3. | Mendiratta V, Sarkar R, Sharma RC, Korann RV. Transition of pemphigus vulgaris to pemphigus foliaceus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2000;66:85-6.  [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
|