Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Print this page Email this page Users Online: 6465
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 54-59

Utility of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and transbronchial needle aspiration in nonneoplastic lung diseases – A single-center experience


1 Department of Pathology, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Army College of Medical Sciences and Base Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Sharmila Dudani
7/41, Vikram Vihar, 3rd Floor, Lajpat Nagar-4, New Delhi - 110 024
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_345_20

Rights and Permissions

Context: Accurate diagnosis may be challenging in nonneoplastic lung diseases. Newer techniques such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial brushing (BB), and transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) have been studied mainly in lung cancers. Aim: This study assesses the efficacy of BAL, BB, and TBNA in non-neoplastic lung diseases, against a gold standard of transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB). Settings and Design: Three-year prospective study in a tertiary care center in North India. Methodology: Adult patients (n = 137) with nonimproving respiratory complaints and clinical and radiological suspicion of having a pulmonary pathology were recruited. Patients of malignancy were excluded. Patients for whom all four samples of BAL, BB, TBNA, and TBLB were unavailable were excluded. Statistical Analysis Used: Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for all tests were computed and represented with 95% confidence intervals. TBLB was taken to be the gold standard. Two or more tests taken in combination were also analyzed. Results: We studied the patients of tuberculosis, interstitial pneumonia, acute and chronic nonspecific inflammation, sarcoidosis, fungal infection, interstitial lung disease, eosinophilic pneumonitis, and pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in this study. TBNA had higher SN and SP (59.8% and 96.7%) than BB (57.0% and 93.3%) or BAL (54.2% and 86.7%). When combined, SN increased to 68.2% and SP decreased to 76.7%. Diagnostic yield for interstitial pneumonia and chronic inflammation was relatively high but poor for tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. Conclusions: TBNA had the highest SN and SP in diagnosing the various nonneoplastic lesions. However, BAL and BB are useful and complementary tools in the definitive diagnosis of localized and diffuse pulmonary infections.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1071    
    Printed68    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded52    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal